|
Type Operators
Example 6.8. Using instanceof with classes<?php The above example will output: bool(true)
Example 6.9. Using instanceof with inherited classes<?php The above example will output: bool(true)
Example 6.10. Using instanceof for class<?php The above example will output: bool(true)
Although Example 6.11. Using instanceof with other variables<?php The above example will output: bool(true)
There are a few pitfalls to be aware of. Before PHP version 5.1.0,
Example 6.12. Avoiding classname lookups and fatal errors with instanceof in PHP 5.0<?php The above example will output: bool(false)
The See also get_class() and is_a(). Code Examples / Notes » language.operators.typed dot schneider
use this for cross-version development... <?php function is_instance_of($IIO_INSTANCE, $IIO_CLASS){ if(floor(phpversion()) > 4){ if($IIO_INSTANCE instanceof $IIO_CLASS){ return true; } else{ return false; } } elseif(floor(phpversion()) > 3){ return is_a($IIO_INSTANCE, $IIO_CLASS); } else{ return false; } } ?> vinyanov
Unfortunately the instanceof operator will not accept a string as its first operand. So I wrote this function. It does exactly the same (ie, successively checks identicalness, inheritance and implementation). Just on strings. <?php function is_instance_of($sub, $super) { $sub = (string)$sub; $super = is_object($super) ? get_class($super) : (string)$super; switch(true) { case $sub === $super; // well ... conformity case is_subclass_of($sub, $super): case in_array($super, class_implements($sub)): return true; default: return false; } } // testing interface X {} class A {} class B extends A {} class C extends B {} class D implements X {} $i = 'is_instance_of'; var_dump($i('A', 'A'), $i('B', 'A'), $i('C', 'A'), $i('D', 'X')); ?> julien plee using g mail dot com
Response to vinyanov at poczta dot onet dot pl: You mentionned "the instanceof operator will not accept a string as its first operand". However, this behavior is absolutely right and therefore, you're misleading the meaning of an instance. <?php 'ClassA' instanceof 'ClassB'; ?> means "the class named ClassA is an instance of the class named ClassB". This is a nonsense sentence because when you instanciate a class, you ALWAYS obtain an object. Consequently, you only can ask if an object is an instance of a class. I believe asking if "a ClassA belongs to a ClassB" (or "a ClassA is a class of (type) ClassB") or even "a ClassA is (also) a ClassB" is more appropriate. But the first is not implemented and the second only works with objects, just like the instanceof operator. Plus, I just have tested your code and it does absolutely NOT do the same as instanceof (extended to classes)! I can't advise anyone to reuse it. The use of <?php is_instance_of ($instanceOfA, 'ClassB'); ?> raises a warning "include_once(Object id #1.php) â¦" when using __autoload (trying to look for $instanceOfA as if it was a class name). Finally, here is a fast (to me) sample function code to verify if an object or class: <?php function kind_of (&$object_or_class, $class) { return is_object ($object_or_class) ? $object_or_class instanceof $class : (is_subclass_of ($object_or_class $class) || strtolower ($object_or_class) == strtolower ($class)); } ?> jphaas
Posting this so the word typeof appears on this page, so that this page will show up when you google 'php typeof'. ...yeah, former Java user.
soletan
Please note: != is a separate operator with separate semantics. Thinking about language grammar it's kind of ridicilous to negate an operator. Of course, it's possible to negate the result of a function (like is_a()), since it isn't negating the function itself or its semantics. instanceof is a binary operator, and so used in binary terms like this terma instanceof termb while ! (negation) is a unary operator and so may be applied to a single term like this !term And a term never consists of an operator, only! There is no such construct in any language (please correct me!). However, instanceof doesn't finally support nested terms in every operand position ("terma" or "termb" above) as negation does: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!term == term So back again, did you ever write a !!!!!!!!!!!!= b to test equivalence? archanglmr
Negated instanceof doesn't seem to be documented. When I read instanceof I think of it as a compairson operator (which I suppose it's not). <?php class A {} class X {} //parse error from ! if (new X !instanceof A) { throw new Exception('X is not an A'); } //proper way to negate instanceof ? if (!(new X instanceof A)) { throw new Exception('X is not an A'); } ?> mikael dot knutsson
I can confirm what thisbizness at gmail dot com said just below in PHP 5.2, furthermore, people looking to use this as a "if $a is not instance of A" for error throwing purposes or other, just type it like this: <?php if( !$a instanceof A ) { throw new Exception( '$a is not instance of A.' ); } ?> This also works if $a is not an object, or not even set (you will get an E_NOTICE if it isn't set though). A note worth making is that if you are unsure of if class A is present when making this comparison, and you don't want to trigger the __autoload() magic method, scroll down for examples of how to get around this. I was unsure about it at first since most other operators have their own negative (like !=) or they are/can be used as function calls (like !is_a()) but it is this simple. Hope it helps someone. Until again! jeanyves dot terrien
Cross version function even if you are working in php4 (instanceof is an undefined operator for php4) function isMemberOf($classename) { $ver = floor(phpversion()); if($ver > 4) { $instanceof = create_function ('$obj,$classname','return $obj instanceof $classname;'); return $instanceof($this,$classname); } else { // Php4 uses lowercase for classname. return is_a($this, strtolower($classname)); } } // end function isMemberOf |